In case you haven't heard, Texas Governor Greg Abbott sent out a tweet that said, "I have declared February 2 to be Chris Kyle Day in Texas." If you've been living under a rock, Chris Kyle is the American soldier who the American Sniper film is based on. Kyle accumulated 160 confirmed kills out of 255 probable kills during his illustrious career with the Navy SEALs. Get your hate speech and rhetoric ready internet, because I'm gonna tell you why this was an ill-conceived idea.
I will preface this by saying that I am not anti-war or anti-military. I think war has its place when it is absolutely unavoidable. I respect the men and women who fight for our country. They're both American heroes and simultaneously just doing their job. I don't mean that to undermine their duty or bravery, but that will be further explained later in this post. I am also from Texas. So while the rest of the internet will surely have people on a particular side of the political fence that will say Texas is foolish and immoral for creating such a holiday, very few will be like me and residing inside of it.
Chris Kyle is an American hero. He did an excellent job as a Navy SEAL during our war with Iraq and he should be commended for that. Which he has been, by the military themselves, The New York Times for American Sniper's 37-week run on their Best Sellers List, and by Hollywood through the film that was made about his life. Not only has he been remembered, he's been glorified more than any member of the military ever was. I'm not here to argue for or against if he's earned any of his previous accolades. However, I do not believe he should have a holiday, in Texas or otherwise.
First and foremost, he's a killer. I do not say that to take away credit for the accomplishments he's made. I've stated my thoughts about the job he did in Iraq, but you cannot take only the good side of what he did and ignore the ugly parts. If you give a man a holiday for being an exceptional sniper, you're also giving a holiday to a man for being an extraordinary murderer. For all the lives he saved, he also took some away. The reason he murdered people is still relevant. That's not me painting the picture the way I want it to be seen, as some would say. It's seeing the entire canvas for what it truly is.
We have a Memorial Day for our fallen soldiers. That's not to say that some members of the military don't deserve a certain amount of unique praise, which they do receive from the military themselves and by those close to them. Hell, if they're good enough they may even get awarded by the President of the United States. There is no shortage of praise given for those men and women who put their lives on the line, but we don't have enough days in the year to handpick out every soldier who did a great job and give them all holidays. Is Chris Kyle more special to us than the 3,493 Medal of Honor recipients we've awarded for their dire moments of courage and bravery during battle? No, he's not better than them. We shouldn't put him singly on his own pedestal simply because he has a movie about his life. He was a great man, like many who came before him, and he should be honored on Memorial Day with them.
With that in mind, if Chris Kyle deserves to have his own holiday, why was Johann “Hans” Breyer arrested in Philadelphia and held without bail until he died in a hospital bed awaiting his extradition hearing for Germany? Both of these men were merely soldiers during a war performing orders handed down to them. Both men were mass murderers and national heroes to their own countries during the time. The one difference is that Johann Breyer would have been killed by Hitler for disobeying his orders if he didn't act them out. So we live in a country that simultaneously sends the message that if you're a fantastic soldier who kills a lot of people for another country during a war, we'll seek out war crimes against you and ship you off to whatever country wants your head. However, if you do the same job for us, you deserve a movie deal, a New York Times best selling book, and your own holiday? Talk about mixed signals.
You cannot call a person who kills the enemy during a war a murderer. To do so equates them with those individuals who choose to kill people of their own accord for no purpose. Just as the court system has different words for people who choose to kill or who accidentally kill or who kill without intent you can't just call someone of murder because they have killed a person. I do agree that you cannot have a holiday to celebrate the enormous number of people he was able to take out, and it was sad that it was required.I do not understand the celebration of war. I often empathize with the loosInIn side. The leaderIngIneIngIten the monster and those who are dying are people just like us, wanting to make a life day to day; feed their kids, go to work, come home,watch a movie and make it to the next day.
ReplyDeleteI disagree, Karen. It's not an easy pill to swallow, but at the end of the day taking a life is taking a life. I have family in the military and I'm so proud of their hard work and service to this country. If I had the balls to serve, I would, but... I don't, to be frank. I don't think I could ever reconcile taking another person's life even if it protects my country. If it protects my family... I'm not saying I wouldn't do it. Because I think I would and I could. But sometimes you just have to call a spade a spade. I wouldn't suggest he or anyone else in times of conflict be put to trial for those actions because that's just how war goes. I respect this man and every man and woman in our armed forces and always will, but you can't discount that lives were taken for any reason.
ReplyDeleteI meant murderer more just as one person who has taken the life of another individual. Not by the legal definition of what he would be called by the justice system. Noted though, perhaps I should have used another word in lieu of the way that one could have been taken. I still think the idea and point of it is accurate.
ReplyDelete